Tuesday, November 24, 2009
-Mahatma Ghandi
Think globally. . .
Monday, November 23, 2009
A big spiritual payoff today. . .
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Frustration with the Media. . .
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Chinese Proverb

"If the water is too clear, there is nothing for the fish to eat". -Quoted by Fareed Zakaria when discussing corruption in China on November 8, 2009. He wrote The Post-American World. You can see Fareed Zakaria GPS on Sunday afternoons on CNN. I just think he is super knowledgeable about foreign affairs, crazy-brilliant and frankly beautiful.
Libertarianism - a look at a different political ideology. . .
The Libertarian Party was originally called the Libertarian Socialists. The party coined itself the Libertarian Party in the mid-19th century. “The Libertarian Party is America's third largest political party, founded in 1971 as an alternative to the two main political parties. Our vision is for a world in which all individuals can freely exercise the natural right of sole dominion over their own lives, liberty and property by building a political party that elects Libertarians to public office, and moving public policy in a libertarian direction”. (Official Libertarian Website[1], Platform) Sounds great so far, doesn’t it? Who doesn’t want liberty? In spite of this very attractive language, the mission statement tells us almost nothing about what Libertarians stand for. So, let’s take a closer look at the party’s platform.
The Libertarian Party Platform was adopted in May of 2008. Commentaries and discussions can be found on Reason TV. Ron Paul and Bob Barr were the candidates that represented the party in 2008, and William Redpath is the chairman of the party. There are twenty-five issues briefly covered in the document. In the interest of brevity, three issues from the Libertarian perspective will be considered.
Foreign Policy. In a word: non-intervention. Certainly, this is an unambiguous and uncomplicated approach, even elegant in its simplicity. I can see why this policy would be attractive to many Americans. In a poll taken by Libertarians, the following statement got 69% of the votes that the poll generated: ”I believe we should follow a Libertarian non-interventionist foreign policy, and start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan”. Libertarian foreign policy is very clear: we just shouldn’t be over there.
Libertarians agree that the solution to our economic problems is in “free trade as prescribed by America’s founders”. (Official Libertarian Website, Issues). Some Libertarians believe in anti-globalization. However, Friedman, Stiglitz, and other economists agree that such an approach would greatly hinder the United States’ ability to compete in the world market economy given that in 2009, our economic security is intertwined with other countries. Taxes. The official website actually stated that all other politicians just want more of your money and are busy increasing the size of government unnecessarily. (Official Libertarian Website, Issues). Further, Libertarians’ position is that the only role the government should have is protecting life, rights and property, and if it limited itself to that, America would prosper and thrive and that government regulation of any kind isn’t necessary to preserve individual rights.
Libertarians’ are disillusioned with the government mainly because the government is subsidizing many expensive unnecessary initiatives like foreign aid, bailing out banks, public art museums, education, railroads, and others. Libertarians don’t want to pay taxes for these purposes. While most Americans tend to acknowledge that the government does squander money, depending on what the particular American values or does not value and I must agree that some of the government’s spending is wasteful, but certainly not all of it. I disagree that every service the government provides other than those that protect constitutional rights and those that protect the country from foreign attack, are worthless. Are schools, libraries, national parks, railroads, energy grids, food regulations, and drug regulations unnecessary and worthless services? Libertarians say “yes”.
Healthcare. Libertarians believe that the “only healthcare reforms that will make a real difference are those that draw on the strength of the free market”. (Official Libertarian Website, Issues). I am starting to see a trend here, are you? By way of reform, Libertarians support a Medical Savings Account. Those without a Medical Savings Account will have a 100% tax deduction for their medical costs. Deregulation of the healthcare industry and the FDA are also part of the Libertarian reform policy. I was somewhat surprised to learn that the above is their only answer to the current healthcare snafu our country faces.
In general, Libertarians’ approach to pretty much all issues that affect Americans is one of self-determinism, which means that the individual should be able to do whatever he/she wishes, so long as he/she is not forcibly interfering with the equal rights of others, and if a person doesn’t like the direction the government is taking, they should rise up and abolish it. (Libertarian Platform, Section 3.7 and Statement of Principles). For example, Libertarians believe that drug usage, whether medicinally or recreationally, should not be a crime. Nor do Libertarians believe in regulating drug usage.
This Laissez-faire attitude, if implemented, could lead to some pretty scary consequences. Any responsible American can easily envision how a person on drugs can and often does forcibly interfere with the rights of others. Doesn’t a child have a right to grow up in a safe environment? How safe would that environment be if the parent’s mind is regularly altered by methamphetamine or heroine? Without drug laws, regulations and child protective services, some children would certainly be at risk under the practice of the Libertarian philosophy. How many people use methamphetamine and heroine recreationally without becoming addicted? It is said that after one experience with heroine, may people are addicted. If Libertarians employed their “hands off” approach, how would addicted people get access to rehabilitation? Is the answer to just let them figure it out on their own? I opine that this philosophy has not been well thought out, and is clearly dangerous if it were to be implemented.
After reading the entire platform, what does “moving public policy in a libertarian direction” actually mean for Americans? If you don’t have the means to meet your basic human needs, well that is just too bad. If you are a poor pregnant woman who can’t afford to deliver your baby in a hospital, just give birth wherever you happen to be when the contractions start – women have been doing so for ages.
Libertarians would have surely poo-poo’ed Roosevelt’s New Deal, and all of those millions of people helped by the New Deal would have certainly starved to death. Feeding and clothing thousands of young men, teaching them self-efficacy, offering them an opportunity to learn skills, and providing for the families of the young men would not have happened. These young men would not have provided valuable services to the country, such as putting out forest fires, constructing power grids, planting thousands of acres of trees, creating a ski industry in States that otherwise had no industry, and improving national parks that we enjoy today. FDR’s brilliant program that significantly helped our country recover from the Depression would not have happened if Libertarians were a party in power at the time.
In theory, the Libertarian party has some really good ideas; self-determinism, limited government, natural rights, and a free-market, are all worth striving for. However, without considering other social factors, Libertarianism would lead to chaos, perhaps anarchy, and the poorer, weaker, less intelligent American’s would lose big. How can we all have freedom, if few are allowed to bully, and take advantage of the weak, as would surely occur if contract regulations ceased and further deregulation were to occur. It seems all very Darwinian to this author. The problem is we are not animals. We are humans, hence the term "humanity", the concept of which Libertarians miss entirely.
Would Libertarians have us abolish government entirely, give up our culture, move to the mountains and grow our own food and hunt for our subsistence? Would this be better than the government we have now, which is admittedly flawed in that governmental bureaucracy is frustratingly slow sometimes. To this author, the Libertarian party seems to support abolishing all government accept civil defense. Libertarians’ answer to social problems in the country is voluntary associations. How they will get the funding since taxes wouldn’t pay for it. . . is anyone’s guess. Donations, I suppose.
How is this party going to get wide support? How many of us are willing to give up parks, transportation safety regulations, food and drug safety regulations, and many other affectations of government in favor of virtual anarchy? In my view, this party will never get the support it needs to elect anyone to congress. And what would an elected Libertarian do once there, dismantle the government for which it was elected to work with? It’s nonsensical. Libertarianism is one of those philosophies that seems very attractive prima facie with its talk of freedom, but on closer analysis, simply not pragmatically sound, nor likely to work for the majority given the size of our country. In researching this political party’s ideology, this author is reminded of the very important responsibility each American holds. We must educate ourselves on the parties, platforms and politicians, and apply some critical thinking skills before we vote.
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Revenge. . .
Friday, October 9, 2009
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Movie Recommendation
Self-awareness tests
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Joseph E. Stiglitz said. . .
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Step one of Project Change Hair Color.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
I want a mommy. . .
I want a Mommy
In the Pulizer Prize winner, The Stone Diaries by Carol Shields, we read about the quiet life of a woman whose mother dies in childbirth. In fact, the first chapter is from an unborn child’s perspective on her own birth and the immediate death of her mother. How surreal. How imaginative, I thought. The child’s name is Daisy, so named by the lady who lives next-door whose favorite flower is the daisy. Daisy is partially raised by a nanny who feels so sorry for the child because she has no mother and according to this nanny, is certainly the worst thing in the world. I have a mother, technically. Yet technically, I am not parented. If do-overs were really possible, I would really like to know what having a mother would be like. (If this were a movie - you would hear a harp and the screen would go fuzzy whilst I set up my fantasy).
I want a mommy to massage my nine-year-old calves when I have growing pains. I want a mommy to tell me to brush my six-year-old teeth and make me nutritious meals with lots of color on the plate. I want a mommy to teach me how to cook eggs sunny side up and to make it her business to know that I am in the most remedial reading group in the first grade. I want a mommy to check my homework and teach me how to study on my own and praise me for getting 100% on my spelling tests. I want a mommy to write me a note when I am sick so my teacher will believe I really was sick and did not just lie to her. I want a mommy to wash my hair when I am sick and too weak to do it myself. I want a mommy to listen to my stories when I get home from school and read to me Dr. Suess books before she tucks me into bed. I want a mommy to lock the front door at night before she goes to bed. I want a mommy to tell me that I am a good girl and is happy she had me.
As an adult woman, it would be nice to know what it would be like to have a mom . . . tell me I look beautiful on my wedding day. . . and show me old Louie Jordan movies and tell me why she thought he was so handsome when she was growing up. It would be really nice if I had a mom that could tell me what I was like as a child so I can understand myself better or to honestly answer my questions about sex, marriage, feminism, women’s health issues and parenting. I wish I had a mom to tell me I have a right to expect my man to respect me. Perhaps if I had a mom to lovingly scold me when I need it and show me a better course than the one I’m on, I can spare myself the wasted time and heartache of making mistakes only codependents make. I long for a mom who can read my moods and offer soothing words and give the kind of hugs that only moms can give.
How do I know this is what moms do? I have watched other moms do their mommy-work and listened to other people’s stories about their mothers. I would be a good mom, I think. But what if I am not? What if I get it all wrong and don’t know it? Who will teach me these things? Where can I find me a mom?
Maybe I should put an ad on craig’s list. “Divorced, 30-something seeking mother figure to teach all mom related lessons. Compensation: gratitude.” That just sounds a bit psycho and perhaps would attract a page-full of psycho-moms. Maybe that isn’t a good idea, after all.
In an effort to learn the lessons I think my mother should have taught me, I read books on reclaiming and parenting the inner child. I did all the exercises, too! I think I get it. Intellectually, I mean. Books are helpful for creating a mental image of what is normal. Perhaps someday I will have the opportunity to be a mommy and a mom. And if I do it mostly right and my child grows up to be mostly happy and well adjusted, then I’d know I learned most of the lessons my mom was supposed to teach me, except I would have learned it from myself, and from emulating the good moms I know. Perhaps I was parented after all.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Schreiner Democrats
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
The First Few Weeks of School
Well, peeps, here is the Fall 2009 lineup:
Monday, September 7, 2009
Dexter

Oh, don't ya just looooove Dexter??? Netflx just informed me that season three is available. Soooo excited!!!! In case you don't know Dex, here is a brief summary - From Wikipedia (portions): "Dexter, Orphaned at the age of three and harboring a traumatic secret, Dexter was adopted by a Miami police officer named Harry Morgan who recognized Dexter's sociopathic tendencies and taught him to channel his gruesome passion for thrill killing by giving it a constructive direction: killing people who deserve it. Most have slipped through the justice system, due to loopholes and technicalities in the law or were never apprehended.
To hide in plain sight and to erase his own crimes, Dexter works as a blood spatter analyst for the Miami Metro Police Department. Although his drive to kill is unflinching (otherwise overcome by a feeling of "emptiness") Dexter is, through extensive instruction from Harry, able to fake normal emotions and keep up his appearance as a socially-responsible human being. Dexter follows this sacred code: that most of Dexter's victims must be killers themselves; people who have killed multiple times with no remorse."
Dexter's dark side is something I strive to understand, being driven by my need to understand others' psychology, or pathology as the case may be. And I connect with the good side of his character because I am attracted to goodness. It's brain/soul candy! It's just dark, yummy and macabre like a chocolate cake shot at the Fetish Ball.
La Belle Dame Sans Merci

Sunday, September 6, 2009
Globalization
The best thing to eat in Kerrville, Texas

It took me a year but I finally found a food item in Kerrville that is better than anywhere else I've ever been. . .It is a place called Mary's Tacos. It is about a mile from campus. All they serve is breakfast tacos. There is usually a line out the door till 2 in the afternoon. They are cheap and fast and quite fabulous. Typically, I get 6 of them every Sunday morning and share them with Jenn during the week (breakfast tacos keep well in the fridge. . . bet you did not know that). I love the egg, cheese and spicy potato with salsa and sour cream. Soooo yummy!
Sloan got a new job. I got a new place.
I just wanna say one thing today:
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Summer 2009 Vegas Trip - Part 1
Peter, me and Jennifer Helm on Peter's birthday at Grape Street. So fun for me. I got to see all of the Bellons and Tom R. and it wasn't even my birthday. Fun for Jenn too. She thought Mike and Peter were both hotties. She commented on how she has never felt so comfortable in a room full of strangers before. Anyone who knows a Bellon knows how warm and welcoming they are!
Spring Cleaning
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Summer so far. . .
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Today we are withdrawing most of our troops from Iraq, finally. . .
Monday, June 29, 2009
Growing up to Michael Jackson
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Girls' night out In Austin. June 2009
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Iran's History and Our Involvement
Everyone knows, or should know by now that I am a news junky. I watch msnbc and cnn so much I know what lame comments Pat Buchanan will make and which of the cnn pundits are most knowledgeable and in what capacity. For the record, David Gergen "is the shiz".
So, Iran has been all over the news. The web has provided Iranians with unprecidented access to world opinion and an ability to communicate their greivances with the rest of the world. Clearly, the younger generation, which comprises the majority of Iran's people, want more connection with the outside world and actual freedom. Until recently, I did not know much about Iran's history, policies, and differing attitudes towards other countries. And since I have some extra time right now and an annoying passion of late for foreign affairs, I thought I'd share the nutshell version of what I have learned. Of course, the information contained below is a brief summary, not particularly vetted and edited by me based on what this westernized, Christian, bleeding heart liberal, female college student deems worthy of focus.
Iran’s History in General: I find Iran’s history to be very complicated and interesting. Iran had a civilization since 3000 BCE. Many moons ago it was called Persia and consisted of Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and the eastern parts of Turkey and Iraq. Persia has been invaded and has had its territory altered throughout the centuries by Arabs, Turks, Mongols, British, Russians, Greeks, and others.
The original and oldest religion in Persia was Zoroastrian. There are just a few of them left today because in 633 the Islamic conquest forced most everyone to convert to Islam. Interesting, huh? The time in history determines if you are an innocent victim or a treacherous warlord.
For centuries Iran experienced foreign occupation and short-lived native dynasties, (kings are called Shahs). In 1501 Iran became an independent state by the Safavid dynasty who established Shi'a Islam as the official religion of their empire. A monarchy prevailed from 1501 until the 1979 Iranian revolution, when Iran officially became an Islamic Republic in 1979. (Maybe I don’t know anything about a republic form of government, but it sure looks like a theocracy from where I am standing).
But let’s back up for a moment. Remember Genghis Khan? This was the Mongol dude that invaded Iran around 1218 and slaughtered millions and millions of people. The population went from 2,500,000 to 250,000. Man, no wonder these people are pissed off. Everyone has f*%#$ed with them since the beginning of time.
Anyway, over the course of 3,000 years, Iran has been a monarchy, republic (in name only), and a theocracy with struggles for power between. All of these invasions led to an interesting recipe. Keep in mind that religion and culture altered somewhat with each invasion.
Currently, the recipe looks like this: “Persian 51%, Azeri 24%, Gilaki and Mazandarani 8%, Kurd 7% and Arab 3%. Iran is a Muslim country, with 89% Shi'a and 10% Sunni Muslims. The remaining 1% belong to Jewish, Bahai and Zoroastrian faiths. The Bahai and Zoroastrian faiths originated in Iran. Major Languages of Iran are Persian (Fars) and Persian dialects 58%, Turkic and Turkic dialects 26%, Kurdish 9%, Luri 2%, Baluchi 1%, and Arabic 1% . . .” (http://www.mideastweb.org/iranhistory.htm)
Pretty much all of the above nationalities can claim a majority in Iran if they are pointing to a particular time in Iran’s history, but originally, the people of Iran/Persia were Persian and their religion was Zoroastrian. So all this bs about the divinity of Islam and the claim that only Islam can save mankind is pretty shaky . . . just as the argument made by any Christian or Jewish faith. Full stop.
Modern political history and current political climate: So we know that Iran was ruled by Shahs until 1979. Well, Reza Shah, an almost effective Shah ruled for almost 16 years until September 16, 1941, when he was forced to abdicate by the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran. He established an authoritarian government that valued nationalism, militarism, secularism and anti-communism combined with strict censorship and state propaganda. Perhaps with the disharmony at the time with the clerics, muslims, etc., this was the best he could do. Anyway, “Reza Shah introduced many socio-economic reforms, reorganizing the army, government administration, and finances. To his supporters his reign brought "law and order, discipline, central authority, and modern amenities - schools, trains, buses, radios, cinemas, and telephones". However, his attempts of modernisation have been criticised for being "too fast" and "superficial", and his reign a time of "oppression, corruption, taxation, lack of authenticity" with "security typical of police states."
During WWI, because of Iran’s oil, Russians and the British occupied Iran to support fuel needs of the war. British picked the next Shah, who liked the British more than the Germans, which was son Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi who ruled until 1979. By the way, after WWII, Russia promised to leave, but stayed until 1946 and wouldn’t leave unless Iran gave them oil. Pahlavi gave much of his power to parliament but parliament was corrupt and never really got it together.
US and Iran: Ever since the Brits were there, they were taking 50% of their oil and a prime minister named Mohammed Mossaddeq tried to nationalize Iran’s oil. With the help of the US, the Brits got rid of him. Perhaps not the most honorable of calls for the US. We convinced Iranian Shah to enter into an agreement with an international consortium of foreign companies which ran the Iranian oil facilities for the next 25 years spitting profits fifty-fifty with Iran but not allowing Iran to audit their accounts or have members on their board of directors. “In 1957 martial law was ended after 16 years and Iran became closer to the West, joining the Baghdad Pact and receiving military and economic aid from the US. In 1961, Iran initiated a series of economic, social, agrarian and administrative reforms to modernize the country that became known as the Shah's White Revolution”. Arguably, this was the most prosperous and free the people of Iran have ever been.
Iranian Revolution in 1979: So the Shah Pahlavi at the time had a big ego and threw a lavish party for himself in 1967. The economy has never been very good due to invasions, internal conflicts between the different cultures, despite the reality that Iran has 10% of the world’s oil and gas. People were pissed off so the Shah suppressed and marginalized his opponents with the help of Iran's security and intelligence organization, the SAVAK, using arbitrary arrest, imprisonment, exile and torture.
This made the religious leader Ayatollah Khomeini decided to get people to overthrow the Shah, which they did. Meanwhile, back at the ranch the Shah was ill with cancer and came to the US for treatment. Khomeini decided the Shah was gonna get US support to take back Iran so Khomeini demanded the US extradite him and the US refused. So Khomeini had some students storm the embassy and take 66 US hostages. We didn’t dig that, see? And we haven’t had a good relationship with Iran since then. The Ayatollah Khomeini and other clerics delivered extremist and threatening speeches against the United States and against its Persian Gulf allies. On the other hand, the government still headed by Bazargan (the prime minister at the time) tried to maintain good relations with the United States, especially as US supply of spare parts for the army and the oil industry that was desperately needed.
So, in retaliation for taking US hostages, President Carter froze several billion dollars of Iranian assets held by American banks in the United States and abroad. We tried to rescue the hostages but failed. Carter was blamed. Iran wouldn’t release our hostages until we had a new President, which was Reagan.
The Ayatollah preached that the people needed to get closer to God and things would be good but the Ayatollah wasn’t very effective as a leader and the economy got much worse and people’s freedoms even more constricted.
In 1980 Iran and Iraq had a war. Iraq, under Saddam Hussein used poisonous gas on the Iranians and killed a million or more. We financially supported Iraq. I’d say we made the wrong call there. In 1988 the war finally ended.
Ayatollah Khomeini died on June 3, 1989 of a heart attack. President Ali Khamenei assumed the role of supreme spiritual leader. (Yep, a President got to be supreme leader).
Most recently, Shi'a Iran does not support the Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist network, and has cooperated in arresting al-Qaeda members. However, Iran supports terror groups including the Lebanese Hizbolla, the Islamic Jihad in Gaza and the West Bank and other groups in Egypt, Algeria and elsewhere. Iranian intelligence is said to be behind the bombing of a Jewish center in Argentina. In the 1980s, Iran apparently inspired bombing of the US embassy and marine barracks in Lebanon, and Iranian funded groups kidnapped numerous American and other Europeans and held them as hostages.
Iran and Nuclear Power: Russia sold them their reactor. They have enriched uranium which would fuel a nuclear weapon. Since this country is rich in fossil fuels, the International Atomic Energy Agency didn’t buy Iran’s assertion that they needed nuclear energy and gave Iran until October 31, 2003 to submit a full account of its nuclear program, and also asked for the right to snap inspections and other measures. After initial resistance, Iran complied, submitting the report ahead of time, and agreeing also to suspend the upgrading of uranium.
The current President: So we know that the Supreme Leader holds the real power. And we know they call themselves a republic (a parliament, judges, mayors, etc.). In the Iranian presidential election, 2005 Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the mayor of Tehran, became the sixth president of Iran, who can serve two terms of 4 years each. Ahmadinajad (almonds in a jar) kisses the Ayatollah’s hand, and his booty, apparently. Houssein Mousave, his apponent in the 2009 election had to be vetted by the Ayatollah to run for President, so the presidential election is really not of huge significance. However, it does seem that the Ayatollah does listen to Ahmadinijad at times. Mousave is more liberal of the two but would really have little power to keep the promises of equality to women that he pledged.
The real change would occur if the people were able somehow to rise up and overthrow the Ayatollah and perhaps a real democratic republic can take root. Perhaps when the Ayatollah dies, this would make things easier. If we wanted to get involved in a constructive way, perhaps we could talk to the expediency council which mediates between Supreme Leader and Parliament to come to a compromise so the people can have more freedoms and the rioting can stop, but I am not convinced that even this interference would not cause the establishment to penalize the people even more.
Now Ahmadinijad doesn’t like us cause he eats from the Ayatollah’s hand. Nor does he like the British, nor Israel very much. Much has been said about him being a holocaust denier but he actually didn’t deny that it happened, he just doesn’t think it was that significant. From his perspective, perhaps the Mongol invasion in Iran was worse. (It’s all relative, I guess). Further, Ahmadinijad has been the dude pushing for nuclear capabilities. The clerics find it to be “unislamic”. Interesting twist. Ahmadinijad has sucked as a president. After his first term, the economy was worse, human rights were worse, woman were worse off. Women can be stoned for infidelity and have no say if their husbands take additional wives. He’s been accused of corruption and favoritism. So, on one hand it would be better for him not to be President but just like when they got rid of the Shah, and the Ayatollah took power, things could get worse.
It seems to me that each time the US intervenes in some way, it gets worse for the people of Iran.
So what is the US interest?: 1-that Iran does not become nuclear-ly armed; 2-democracy to prevail; 3-some would say: oil. The last one really sucks. This is why focusing on renewable forms of energy is so important. We can’t be like the Brits and just steal Iran's oil.
President Obama, who apparently knows his world history . . . and because he’s a scholarly kind of dude, will speak today. I hope he can illuminate this topic for us and bring us to an understanding. There is no reason to for us to have infighting about Iran. And I doubt there would be much if we took the time to educate ourselves. We have made some bad calls in the past. We need to be very thoughtful in our approach to Iran and if it is best for the people of Iran to just provide moral support, then that should be our guide, not any monetary interest. As usual, I agree with Obama's perspective and think his heart and head are in the right place.
A Brief History of Iranian Politics
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Friday, June 5, 2009
Rahm Emanuel said:
Thursday, May 28, 2009
July Visit to Las Vegas.
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Joy and Gratitude
My favorite book right now is by Dr. Seuss. Thanks Tami. I read it all the time.
Oh, the Places You'll Go!
Congratulations!
Today is your day.
You're off to Great Places!
You're off and away!
You have brains in your head.
You have feet in your shoes
You can steer yourself
any direction you choose.
You're on your own. And you know what you know.
And YOU are the guy who'll decide where to go.
You'll look up and down streets. Look 'em over with care.
About some you will say, "I don't choose to go there."
With your head full of brains and your shoes full of feet,
you're too smart to go down any not-so-good street.
And you may not find any
you'll want to go down.
In that case, of course,
you'll head straight out of town.
It's opener there
in the wide open air.
Out there things can happen
and frequently do
to people as brainy
and footsy as you.
And when things start to happen,
don't worry. Don't stew.
Just go right along.
You'll start happening too.
OH!
THE PLACES YOU'LL GO!
You'll be on your way up!
You'll be seeing great sights!
You'll join the high fliers
who soar to high heights.
You won't lag behind, because you'll have the speed.
You'll pass the whole gang and you'll soon take the lead.
Wherever you fly, you'll be the best of the best.
Wherever you go, you will top all the rest.
Except when you don' t
Because, sometimes, you won't.
I'm sorry to say so
but, sadly, it's true
and Hang-ups
can happen to you.
You can get all hung up
in a prickle-ly perch.
And your gang will fly on.
You'll be left in a Lurch.
You'll come down from the Lurch
with an unpleasant bump.
And the chances are, then,
that you'll be in a Slump.
And when you're in a Slump,
you're not in for much fun.
Un-slumping yourself
is not easily done.
You will come to a place where the streets are not marked.
Some windows are lighted. But mostly they're darked.
A place you could sprain both you elbow and chin!
Do you dare to stay out? Do you dare to go in?
How much can you lose? How much can you win?
And IF you go in, should you turn left or right...
or right-and-three-quarters? Or, maybe, not quite?
Or go around back and sneak in from behind?
Simple it's not, I'm afraid you will find,
for a mind-maker-upper to make up his mind.
You can get so confused
that you'll start in to race
down long wiggled roads at a break-necking pace
and grind on for miles across weirdish wild space,
headed, I fear, toward a most useless place.
The Waiting Place...
...for people just waiting.
Waiting for a train to go
or a bus to come, or a plane to go
or the mail to come, or the rain to go
or the phone to ring, or the snow to snow
or waiting around for a Yes or a No
or waiting for their hair to grow.
Everyone is just waiting.
Waiting for the fish to bite
or waiting for wind to fly a kite
or waiting around for Friday night
or waiting, perhaps, for their Uncle Jake
or a pot to boil, or a Better Break
or a sting of pearls, or a pair of pants
or a wig with curls, or Another Chance.
Everyone is just waiting.
NO!
That's not for you!
Somehow you'll escape
all that waiting and staying.
You'll find the bright places
where Boom Bands are playing.
With banner flip-flapping,
once more you'll ride high!
Ready for anything under the sky.
Ready because you're that kind of a guy!
Oh, the places you'll go! There is fun to be done!
There are points to be scored. there are games to be won.
And the magical things you can do with that ball
will make you the winning-est winner of all.
Fame! You'll be famous as famous can be,
with the whole wide world watching you win on TV.
Except when they don't.
Because, sometimes, they won't.
I'm afraid that some times
you'll play lonely games too.
Games you can't win
'cause you'll play against you.
All Alone!
Whether you like it or not,
Alone will be something
you'll be quite a lot.
And when you're alone, there's a very good chance
you'll meet things that scare you right out of your pants.
There are some, down the road between hither and yon,
that can scare you so much you won't want to go on.
But on you will go
though the weather be foul
On you will go
though your enemies prowl
On you will go
though the Hakken-Kraks howl
Onward up many
a frightening creek,
though your arms may get sore
and your sneakers may leak.
On and on you will hike
and I know you'll hike far
and face up to your problems
whatever they are.
You'll get mixed up, of course,
as you already know.
You'll get mixed up
with many strange birds as you go.
So be sure when you step.
Step with care and great tact
and remember that Life's
a Great Balancing Act.
Just never forget to be dexterous and deft.
And never mix up your right foot with your left.
And will you succeed?
Yes! You will, indeed!
(98 and 3 / 4 percent guaranteed.)
KID, YOU'LL MOVE MOUNTAINS!
So...
be your name Buxbaum or Bixby or Bray
or Mordecai Ali Van Allen O'Shea,
you're off to Great Places!
Today is your day!
Your mountain is waiting.
So...get on your way!
---Dr. Seuss
